People never cease to amaze me (part 84)

Question I received this morning:

27 yrs ago when my boyfriend was 26 he fondled his step daughter. This went on for aprox 5-6 months and he put a end to it. He remained her stepfather until four years ago when his wife died. She was aware of the abuse. He has felt great remorse and guilt over the years and has done everything possible to make it up to her. He has paid her bills, worked on her home and cars, bought her cars, paid for her education, given her a place to live, paid for her vacations ect. Five months ago he said no more and closed the wallet.

Continue Reading...

Reading the fine print

I received an interesting question the other day that really shows me people do not know what they are doing when they say "I do":

MY HUSBAND LEFT ME TO LIVE WITH ANOTHER WOMEN,7 MONTHS AGO. NOW HE WANTS TO COME BACK. I PUT HIS NAME ON THE TITLE OF MY HOUSE. HOW CAN I KEEP HIM OUT OF HERE. CAN HE COME BACK WHEN HE HAS BEEN LIVING WITH ANOTHER WOMEN. 

My Answer: You can't.

This got me to thinking.  There are two things that people decide to do that make no sense, statistically speaking:

Continue Reading...

Choosing Poorly (A Post Many Will Not Want to Read)

At the end of the movie Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, the bad guy and Indiana finally arrive at a room holding a bunch of goblets and guarded by an old man.  One of the cups was the one Jesus used at the last supper, and anyone who drinks from it will get to live forever.  The bad guy picks one, drinks from it, and is immediately turned into a pretty gross corpse.  The old man looks at Indiana and says, "He choose poorly".
 

 

Continue Reading...

Mortgages and Divorce

A frequent question I receive often:

My x was order by the court in my divorce decree to refinance in 90 days to have my name removed from our joint property....or he has to sell with my coroperation....he said he was letting the property foreclose....what can i do to keep this from effecting my credit....my name is on everthing...he has not taken my name of the property as far as taxes, insurance, nothing....what can i do so that i will not be finacially responsible for this debt.

My answer:

Continue Reading...

Happy New Years!

The beginning of the new year seems so full of opportunity and also allows everyone to make their latest 'new years resolutions'.  While many will fail (including my resolution to eat better), it is part of our tradition to review, analyze, and attempt to correct our current shortcomings at the turn of the calender.  

As I have written before, this time of the year is also one of the busiest for divorce lawyers, as many people's new year makeover do not include their spouse.  I have several new clients who literally are waiting until this coming monday to deliver the bad news to their spouse.  Many people figure that ending things in the middle of the holiday season is a pain, especially when children are involved.  

Last thought: Not all divorces in 2010 need to be messy. The parents who can put their kids before their new boyfriend/girlfriend simply handle things differently then parents who allow personal feelings or anger over the divorce to affect their innocent (and non-blameworthy) children.

 Here is a question typical of what I get at least once a month:

 

What is the possibilities to win a 50/50 physical custody in a one year old?

as a non custodial parent ( i am the father) what is the possibilities to win 50/50 physical custody in a one year old ? im from illinois she live 70 miles away from me, im thinking like one week here on one week with here split all the expences is this is possible? we both hold a job and we have a good moral caracter.. thank you for the help

 

Here is my answer:

Zero. First, Illinois does not do split physical custody (see earlier posts). Here is the reason:

The courts do not like to confuse a kid and not have one stable environment where he can call 'home'. It wouldn't work once he is in school anyway, so your asking for a temporary solution. The courts like to establish stability and upending a child's entire living arrangement in a couple of years is not stable.

You have to think whats in the best interest of the child. Honestly, your request is probably more for your benefit then his. While many non-custodial parents wish to have more time with their child (and some simply wish to avoid paying support), the reality is that the living arrangement a good parent should want for their child is the one in which the child is most likely to become a well adjusted, happy, kid who is successful in school.

 

Oral agreements are worth the paper their written on

 I received several inquiries today from people who wanted to know how they go about enforcing an oral agreement.  My first option would be to get a time machine.  That way the person can go back, grab a lawyer, have him draft an agreement, and get the person to sign it.  My second option would be . . . look at it as a learning experience for next time when you should grab a lawyer, have him draft an agreement, and get the person to sign it.  

Let's be logical about this (I know that is not common in my line of work).  Here is one typical example: I person who you promised to spend the rest of your life with, who discovered you were cheating on them, makes a verbal agreement with you regarding your rights to see your children and how much child support to pay.  No need for lawyers because 'they just cost a lot of money".  Six months later, when your ex meets the new love of her her life, she suddenly doesn't seem real accommodating, files a petition for child support, and claims you have never paid a dime.  Oh, and she cuts off visitation until 'things are worked out in court', maybe in 9 months or so.  All that could have been avoided.  

This may be counter intuitaive, but your ex will normally be at their most agreeable right before the divorce is final. Both sides want it over, each person needs the other to sign off on the MSA, and each person has this self perception of themselves as reasonable.  Also, neither party has usually fallen in love with their new boyfriend or girlfriend, so you have not been relagated to unwanted ex yet.

And don't get me started about child support.  The number of men paying cash for child support when there is no agreement in place explains why con artists are so successful: there is a sucker born every minute.

Here are my bulletpoints from this post:

1. GET A LAWYER.  You can always make more money, its harder to make more kids.

2. Child support, visitation, custody, and parentage need to always be in writing.

3. Do not put off hard issues for later, put them in writing up front.

4. Do not verbally change a written agreement unless it is VERY minor.

5. Unless you are a family lawyer, do not agree to anything orally or in writing until it is reviewed by and attorney and you understand it.

4. NEVER pay money to someone that you cannot prove you paid that money (I know this is obvious but . . .) And If you pay child support in cash call me because I have a bridge in brooklyn to sell you.

Respecting Illinois judges (part II)

6 Months in jail for flipping off the judge.  I love these stories, as its about time judges started taking back the courtroom from people who think the ghetto or trailer park they live in somehow extends to the courtroom:

http://cbs2chicago.com/local/mchenry.contempt.court.2.1288146.html

Tags:

New Parental Notification Law takes effect Nov 3rd

For those of you who do not know, starting tomorrow, November 3rd, the law requiring parental notification goes into effect in regards to abortion.  Now this is not a post regarding abortion, but rather my thoughts as a family lawyer on the issue of parental notification.

Lets start off by saying that abortion is legal, so for those of you who raise the argument "but it should not be", that argument is irrelevant here.  And for those who believe that abortion should be unrestricted, they are missing the point as well.  We have long held that common sense restrictions on even fundamental rights, such as free speech is necessary.  

There are many instances in which the government, and society, have determined that because something is legal does not mean minors can do it.  Remember that minors legally do not possess the maturity to enter into contracts.  Society has held since long before the formation of this country that minors should not be held to agreements that they sign because they do not have the knowledge and maturity to make informed decisions.  Critics of the new bill claim that somehow such minors do have the maturity to determine whether to end a pregnancy (and depending on your viewpoint, perhaps a life).  I would like to make the decision to terminate a pregnancy at least up there with buying a car (which minors cannot do on their own).

Examining the new law, I can't help but think its much to do about nothing as it will not prevent abortions or help parents resume their former role of . . . well parents. 

First, the law has the old caveat whereby a minor can simply go to a judge and ask to bypass the notificaiton.  There are already free legal aid groups popping up to walk children through the process. 

Second, its a parental NOTIFICATION law, not a parental consent law.  So unlike most neighboring states, parents do not have to consent to the abortion, just be told by their underage daughter that the daughter is going ahead with the abortion whether the parents like it or not. 

Third, (and this is really silly), the notification form, supposedly signed by the parents, required under the new law will be brought in by the children themselves.  Gee, think any scared girls will simply forge their parents signature?  I'm sure Planned Parenthood will really follow up to confirm the signatures are legit.  And why should the underage girl worry?  Even if she is caught, she is too young to be prosecuted as an adult, after all she is too young to know what she is doing. 

Fourth, why is this particular procedure treated differently than every other medical procedure a child may undergo?  A sixteen year old cannot elect to have a kidney operation without parental consent (not just notification).  I would bet that abortion has a higher risk of harm to the minor child (I'm referring to the mother) then many medical procedures.  Shouldn't the parents, who the legal system say is presumed to have the child's best interest in mind, at least know what their child is up to at Planned Parenthood?

My final thought is that I see parents routinely abdicate their responsibility as parents, leaving it to public schools to teach sex ed, among other values.  I see non-custodial parents never spending time with their children, oftentimes because the custodial parent has made it their life's goal of alienating the aforementioned non-custodial parent from their child.   Part of all this results from our evolving belief in the role of the state for our children (the subject of a whole other post).  It's no longer the parents job to provide health care, its the government.  The government will soon provide half of this countries children with food stamps at some point in the child's life.  Likewise, parents no longer have the authority to determine when to spank their children without fear of having those children taken away by state employees who are not exactly held to private sector standards of excellence. Google "DCFS abuse" and read about how the state treats Illinois parents. 

Until Nov 3rd, Illinois parents are not even allowed to KNOW when their underage child is getting an abortion, never mind having a say in such a momentous decision.  We don't hand a fourteen year old car keys just because they think they are ready to drive, and we should similarly keep medical decisions out of their hands as well.

Happy Halloween!

Hope everyone has a safe Halloween, and enjoy the kids (if you have any).  Halloween is one of those quasi-holidays for parenting time purposes.  Parents who fight over such things as having the kids for their own birthday, and minor holidays such as Memorial Day just do not get it.  Does your 6 month old really need to ring in the new year?  Sheesh.  I recently had to remind a client that their one year old won't remember the holidays this year and not to worry about exactly splitting holiday time before a parenting schedule can be drawn up.

The purpose of parenting time is for the children.  During negotiations over parenting time, I once had a client respond, "I need them!", referring to her two children.  This client, and many other people in her situation, have difficulty with shared parenting because they are thinking of what they want, rather than what their children need.  Another example is non-custodial parents who demand to have an equal amount of parenting time with the children.  Common sense, and many studies, tell us that children need a stable home environment with one parent and substantial visitation with the other.  But kids need ONE home, not two where they split their time.  Although there are certainly exceptions to the rule, generally in these situations, the non-custodial parent is being unrealistic.  The reality is that NCP's will simply not see their children as much after ending their relationship with the CP.  That is one of the reasons why some people stay in relationships with the other parent despite not loving the other parent anymore.  

Anyway, back to Halloween.  I think this is a good event that parents who are cordial should try to participate with the children together. Its informal, most people don't have family committments (like Christmas or Thanksgiving).  And the kids can see their parents working together and being good with each other.  Children are very attentive to how their parents interact, and are much less stressed out, and more likely to be better socialized if their parents 'show the way'.